- Research & Insights
- About Us
- Become a client
What would-be automation adopters must ask themselves is: Can the data and insights Kryon provides help us achieve our desired business outcomes more easily?
While Kryon’s customers were certainly hinting in that direction at its recent Automation Expedition event, they could be more straight-to-the-point about the outcomes they’re achieving. For example, Johnson & Johnson referenced process and systems improvements, but no tangible value in terms of quality, speed, or cost; bp, the energy major, commented on new and improved operating guides and training times, without a real cut-through outcome outlining the scale of change achieved.
In fine Kryon fashion, 2020’s well-humored Automation Olympics on-line event became 2021’s “Automation Expedition” with a glimpse into Indiana Jones and the Search for Kryon (in the Cave of Full-Cycle Automation).
Kryon’s CEO, Harel Tayeb, kicked off the event maintaining the firm’s positioning as the “leading full-cycle automation company,” with full-cycle automation (FCA) encompassing the marrying of process discovery and automation. He delivered a review of 2020 accomplishments, including Kryon’s cloud-based RPA-as-a-service (RPAaaS) launch and a nod to its real-time AI-enabled process discovery. The roadmap portion of the program was a bit murkier, but ultimately Tayeb landed on “base your decisions on data with Kryon” and underscored it with the two event announcements: the launch of a free process discovery as-a-service tool and a rearchitected Studio+. The former aims to enable more users to experience a taste of the burgeoning process intelligence market; the latter hopes to foster enhanced collaboration and ease of use between citizen and expert developers.
Kryon put forward two headline announcements at Automation Expedition:
Despite the potential of these announcements to add a lot to the Kryon product suite and outcomes for its customers, these outcomes risk getting lost in the same hype gripping the broader automation market: the hype around cloud, SaaS, and “low-code” citizen development. Kryon echoed a market shouting that “the future of automation starts with SaaS.” But is this really the case? Its competition is going hard on automation in the cloud, integrating discovery, and promoting all-around process intelligence and integrated technologies—some of it for free. But in reality, who cares where automation is or how it comes once outcomes are clear?
What Kryon did well last year was focus on full-cycle automation throughout processes and the integration of automation, analytics, and AI plus process discovery, enabling these technologies to achieve their best potential. Kryon still has this mindset, but messaging must stay laser-focused on the value of process understanding and the resulting automation. Kryon’s goal is very much a product-led growth movement.
Full-cycle process automation is Kryon’s sweet spot. Discovery is not a prerequisite for automation, but it helps. Orchestration in an improved Studio+ will hopefully double-down on this sweet spot combination and full-cycle automation.
Brooks Olphin, Product Line Owner for Process and Task Mining at Johnson & Johnson, explained that the outcomes are in the technology’s own name: discovering the process. Johnson & Johnson is finding previously hidden specs, updating documents and standard operating procedures (SOPs), and using these to improve the training of new hires; Johnson & Johnson has also been able to identify broad improvements throughout processes and systems, forming the baselines for business roadmapping. However, it remains unclear what the tangible value of these measures is versus the status quo, Johnson & Johnson’s investments, and what other options they might have investigated.
Steve Sutton, a business process management (BPM) consultant at BP, discussed how the energy giant wanted to mitigate the risk of insourcing 1,600 FTEs (full-time equivalents), accelerate process document creation, and build a training tool. The company wanted to eliminate unnecessary process variance; many processes are in the “extreme legacy” category with the same departments doing the same stuff differently. BP created guide videos for repetitive processes, which reduced training times for new hires in areas with repetitive tasks performed in collaboration with attended bots. In the future, BP plans to use Kryon’s Studio+ to low-code automate processes. Like Johnson & Johnson’s example, while the challenges and outcomes are in the journey, they were at risk of being lost in the conversation for those not as attentive. A suggestion is leading from the front with outcomes aligned to business challenges and the overall business context; at each stage, go into more detail, but always maintain alignment with the outcomes.
In an automation market that so often loses sight of what technology means for business outcomes, there are deep pools of customer stories to draw on, but the outcomes of these stories are at risk of getting lost. Enterprise automation leaders must demand clear outcomes aligned to their challenges and then meticulously circle back to these outcomes in every customer story and new announcement a vendor tries and put in front of them. Kryon must continue to find a way to illustrate where it plays in the broader madness of the automation competition that risks hyping itself into oblivion around cloud, SaaS, citizen development; that will showcase Kryon’s maturity and the value of its full-cycle automation to customers on a new level.