Take 5 Report

Make Services-as-Software™ the new PE operating model for AI

This HFS Take 5 report is for private equity operating partners, CIOs, heads of value creation, and investment partners deciding how to buy AI-led services across their portfolio companies.

Executive summary

New research finds that private equity (PE) value creation is being operationalized. AI-led modernization, productized delivery, and underwritten outcomes now define how PE firms buy services.

PE firms have stopped treating technology as back-office support. AI and automation now top the portfolio value-creation agenda, backed by a wave of capital. The buying logic has changed, and execution increasingly runs through productized, repeatable delivery alongside expanding in-house and GCC capability. PE firms reward quantified, underwritten outcomes and productized, repeatable delivery that scales across portfolio companies. They are skeptical of broad capability and orchestration claims that are not backed by proof.

HFS Research, in partnership with Cognizant, surveyed 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms to understand where they are placing their AI bets, how sourcing models are shifting, and what a Services-as-Software model means for their value creation.

The survey uncovered five key takeaways:
  • AI-led value creation tops PE firms’ agenda
    AI and automation is the top portfolio value-creation priority (54%), with 79% of PE firms planning to increase their AI budget by more than 25% over the next two years.
  • Services-as-Software is becoming the go-to model for PE firms
    Eighty-one percent of PE firms plan to expand Services-as-Software and 88% for GCC usage, while 1 in 4 expects to cut traditional IT outsourcing.
  • Diligence, documents, and fund admin lead AI’s scaling shortlist
    The AI use cases set to scale concentrate in PE firm functions are deal diligence (51%), document intelligence (43%), and fund administration (41%).
  • For PE firms, proven results beat broad claims
    The claims PE firms find most believable are specific and measurable: underwritten pre-close cost savings, platform-first delivery, and cost-effective onshore and nearshore delivery. Ecosystem orchestration draws the most doubt. PE firms want proof, not partner logos.
  • PE firms are running ahead of their portfolio companies on AI
    A third of PE firms (34%) already run production-grade AI, while nearly half of PortCos (47%) remain at exploration or earlier stages. The firm itself is the natural place to start and then scale to portfolio companies (PortCos).

The Bottom Line: PE firms are looking to operationalize AI through Services-as-Software. The firms that pull ahead demand quantified baselines, underwritten outcomes, and repeatable delivery that scales across their portfolio companies, holding partners to proof rather than positioning.

Why this matters now

PE firms must create value faster, but the traditional outsourcing model was not built for outcome accountability or portfolio-scale speed.

Returns increasingly depend on operational improvement, not financial engineering, so PE firms need faster, more reliable ways to drive change across the portfolio.

Why PE firms are rethinking how they buy services:

  • Traditional outsourcing gives cost but not certainty
    Headcount-based, effort-priced models offer no underwritten outcomes, limited control, and little that scales repeatably across portfolio companies.
  • AI changes what is possible
    As delivery shifts from people to software, PE firms can buy productized, outcome-backed services rather than effort.
  • AI-led value creation tops PE firms’ agenda

AI and automation top PE firms’ value-creation agenda, with 79% of them planning to increase their AI budget by more than 25% over the next two years.

Four-row horizontal bar graphic titled "What are the top value-creation priorities for your portfolio? (Top four shown; percentage of respondents)," showing the share of private equity executives naming each priority. AI and automation is 54%, data platform modernization and analytics is 42%, rapid TCO reduction/cost takeout is 41%, and application modernization is 32%. The AI and automation row is highlighted to mark it as the leading priority. Sample: 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms. Source: Cognizant and HFS Research, 2026.

  • AI is where incremental capital is heading, with a vast majority of PE firms planning to raise AI budgets over the next two years.
  • The top two priorities, AI and automation (54%) and data modernization (42%) show that PE firms are banking on intelligent operations to drive results.
  • The shortlist is execution-led. Rapid TCO reduction (41%) and application modernization (32%) round out the top four, showing that operational hygiene still earns budget alongside the AI push.
  • PE firms expect AI to be embedded across data, cloud, and application programs, not bought as a standalone initiative.
  • Traditional levers such as BPO and consulting are now judged against execution outcomes, not funded as standalone spend.
  • Services-as-Software is becoming the go-to model for PE firms

Eighty-one percent of PE firms plan to significantly expand Services-as-Software, while one in four expects to cut traditional IT outsourcing.

Five-row horizontal bar graphic titled "How do you expect AI-related budgets to change over the next two years? (Percentage of respondents)," showing the expected direction and size of AI budget change at PE firms. Increase by more than 25% is 79%, increase by 11%–25% is 12%, increase by 1%–10% is 4%, stay flat is 3%, and decrease is 2%. The "increase by more than 25%" row is highlighted in purple. Sample: 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms. Source: Cognizant and HFS Research, 2026.

  • Services-as-Software is emerging as the preferred scaling model. PE firms want productized, replicable delivery that reduces dependency on headcount-based approaches.
  • GCCs show similarly strong momentum as firms prioritize control, IP ownership, and repeatability across portfolio companies.
  • Traditional IT outsourcing is the casualty of this shift, squeezed between the efficiency of software and the strategic value of GCCs.
    • One in four PE executives expect to reduce IT outsourcing spending over the next two years.
    • Rising delivery costs and the desire for greater in-house control are the leading reasons for cutting back.
  • Certainty is what PE firms are buying, with quantifiable savings, risk transfer, and access to talent driving the expansion of Services-as-Software.
  • Diligence, documents, and fund admin lead AI’s scaling shortlist

The use cases set to scale sit squarely in PE firms’ functions: deal diligence (51%), document intelligence (43%), and fund administration (41%).

Diverging stacked bar chart titled "How do you expect your firm's use of the following sourcing approaches to change over the next two years?," plotting four sourcing approaches against a five-point scale of significant reduction, moderate reduction, maintain levels, moderate expansion, and significant expansion, with reductions and maintained levels to the left of a center line and expansions to the right. Services-as-Software, described as productized services delivered through software, shows 0% significant reduction, 8% moderate reduction, 4% maintain levels, 7% moderate expansion, and 81% significant expansion. Global Capability Centers (GCCs) show 1% significant reduction, 3% moderate reduction, 8% maintain levels, 37% moderate expansion, and 51% significant expansion, for 88% total expansion. Business process outsourcing (BPO) shows 4% significant reduction, 13% moderate reduction, 9% maintain levels, 35% moderate expansion, and 39% significant expansion. Information technology (IT) outsourcing shows 7% significant reduction, 19% moderate reduction, 14% maintain levels, 27% moderate expansion, and 33% significant expansion, for 26% total reduction. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding. Sample: 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms. Source: Cognizant and HFS Research, 2026.

  • The AI use cases scaling first are the ones best suited to the Services-as-Software model: productized, repeatable, and sitting where data is already centralized at the firm, so adoption can be standardized quickly.
  • The top use cases share a common profile: document and data-intensive, rules-based work built on repeatable workflows.
  • That profile is what makes them the easiest wins, where AI augments existing processes rather than forcing operational change.
  • For PE firms, proven results beat broad claims

PE firms back partners that can prove specific, measurable results, not those promising broad, all-in-one capability.

Vertical bar chart titled "Which AI use cases do you expect to scale in the next two years?," showing the percentage of PE executives expecting each use case to scale. Deal diligence and analytics is 51%, document intelligence/unstructured document processing is 43%, fund administration and investor reporting/NAV acceleration is 41%, risk and compliance, KYC, AML is 35%, service-desk/IT operations assistants is 28%, finance and tax workflows is 25%, TCO diagnostics and operations automation is 22%, contact center/agent assist is 22%, and software engineering productivity is 18%. Sample: 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms. Source: Cognizant and HFS Research, 2026.

  • PE firms believe what they can measure. Platform-first delivery (59%), underwritten pre-close cost savings (58%), and cost-effective onshore and nearshore delivery (58%) are the claims they trust most.
  • Firms only buy underwritten savings when partners can prove how they’ll get there and stand behind the result.
  • The broadest claims draw the most doubt. Only 42% find end-to-end technology, operations, and AI capability believable, and 46% sit on the fence, so it reads as a stretch rather than a strength.
  • Ecosystem orchestrator is the least credible claim of all, at 32% believable and 40% outright doubtful. Many PE firms would rather manage those relationships themselves.
  • PE firms are running ahead of their portfolio companies on AI

A third of PE firms (34%) already run AI in limited or scaled production, while nearly half of portfolio companies (47%) remain at exploration or earlier.

Diverging stacked bar chart titled "How believable do you find the following claims when used by a service provider? (Percentage of respondents)," plotting five service provider claims against a five-point scale of not believable, skeptical, neutral, believable, and highly believable, with doubt to the left of a center line and belief to the right. Platform-first delivery model (including BPaaS) shows 2% not believable, 2% skeptical, 37% neutral, 38% believable, and 21% highly believable, for 59% total belief. Underwritten cost savings (TCO reduction) pre-close shows 3% not believable, 16% skeptical, 23% neutral, 30% believable, and 28% highly believable, for 58% total belief. Cost-effective onshore and nearshore delivery model shows 3% not believable, 13% skeptical, 25% neutral, 30% believable, and 28% highly believable, for 58% total belief. End-to-end technology, operations, and AI capability shows 1% not believable, 11% skeptical, 46% neutral, 27% believable, and 15% highly believable, for 42% total belief. Acts as an ecosystem orchestrator with key technology and consulting partners shows 11% not believable, 29% skeptical, 28% neutral, 24% believable, and 8% highly believable, for 32% total belief and 40% total doubt, the least credible claim in the set. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding. Sample: 102 decision-making executives at global PE firms. Source: Cognizant and HFS Research, 2026.

  • PE firms are ahead of their PortCos: 34% run AI in limited or scaled production versus 28% of portfolio companies, while 47% of PortCos have not moved past exploration.
  • The firm is the natural place for PE investors to start. They control their own operations, data, and decisions, so AI moves from pilot to production faster at the firm level than across the portfolio.
  • PE firms also control governance and funding decisions early, while PortCos need business-case approval, leadership alignment, and integration into operating budgets.
  • Scaling across PortCos is inherently slower because each company starts from its own systems and stage of readiness.
The Bottom Line: PE firms are looking to operationalize AI through the Services-as-Software model

The firms that pull ahead demand quantified baselines, underwritten outcomes, and repeatable delivery that scales across their portfolio companies

AI-led modernization at a portfolio scale is within reach, but only when claims are quantified, governance is explicit, and delivery is repeatable. That is the bar PE firm leaders should set

To capture the value, PE firms must

  • Demand portfolio playbooks, not point solutions; get partners to show how value is created repeatably across PortCos
  • Buy impact, not effort; insist on underwritten, outcome-backed commercials over time-and-materials
  • Expect more than platforms; assemble complementary partners that cover orchestration, data, and execution

Orchestration is judged on results, not positioning. PE firms test it through execution metrics: Outcomes delivered, not partner logos

Sign in to view or download this research.

Login

Register

Insight. Inspiration. Impact.

Register now for immediate access of HFS' research, data and forward looking trends.

Get Started

Download Research

    </label

    Sign In

    Sign up for a free
    research account

    With the exception of our Horizons reports, most of our research is available for free on our website. Sign up for a free account and start realizing the power of insights now.

    By registering you agree to our privacy policy.

    I hereby consent that HFS Research can process my personal data.

    Digests/Newsletters: Overviews of the latest news, insight, and research by HFS.

    HFS Events: Exclusive invitations to HFS webinars, roundtables, and summits, bringing together key industry stakeholders focused on major innovations impacting business operations.

    Premium Access

    Our premium subscription gives enterprise clients access to our complete library of proprietary research, direct access to our industry analysts, and other benefits.

    Contact us at [email protected] for more information on premium access.

      Contact Ask HFS AI Support